The risk of late effects following pediatric and adult radiotherapy regimens in Hodgkin lymphoma.

PURPOSE: Adolescent young adults (AYA) with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) are treated according to either pediatric or adult protocols, however, the best strategy has yet to be established. We describe the AYA patients referred for radiotherapy and quantify the risk of radiation-induced late effects and the corresponding life years lost (LYL) following pediatric and adult regimens. METHODS: Patients ≤24 years irradiated for HL were included. For each patient, organs at risk (OARs) were contoured and dosimetric parameters were extracted. Estimated excess hazard ratios of radiation-induced late effects were calculated from dose-response models and LYL attributable to various late effects were estimated. RESULTS: In total, 77 patients were analyzed (pediatric regimen: 15; adult regimen: 62). Age, clinical stage, and the number of patients enrolled in protocols were significantly different between the groups. Pediatric patients had more advanced disease, which resulted in larger target volumes and higher doses to most OARs, despite a lower prescribed dose compared to adult regimens. LYL estimates were all higher with the pediatric regimens. Total LYL with pediatric and adult treatment regimens were 3.2 years and 2.3 years, respectively. Due to the clinical stage variation and heterogeneity in disease location, a direct comparison of the estimated risks of late effects was only exploratory. CONCLUSION: Pediatric regimens selected patients with more advanced disease to radiotherapy resulting in larger target volumes and higher doses to the OARs. Target volume rather than prescribed dose impacted OAR exposure. Consequently, the estimated risk of radiation-induced late effects and corresponding LYL was increased when compared to adult regimens.

Memory Buttons in Combination with Mobile Application-Induced Objective and Subjective Effects in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic skin condition where nonadherence often results in lack of disease control. OBJECTIVE: We wanted to determine whether the combination of an electronic memory button and a supportive application (app) would affect the Quality of Life and subjective and objective severity measures among AD patients over one month following the patient's normal schedules of treatment. METHODS: A randomized, investigator-blinded, prospective observational feasibility study for one month where patients diagnosed with AD were randomized based on POEM severity score and divided into 3 groups. The 3 groups were (1) the control group with two consultations, (2) in addition to group 1, patients also received electronic memory buttons to click every time they used their topical products, and (3) in addition to group 2, patients also received an app to track their treatment schedules. At both consultations, patients were evaluated using SCORAD, EASI, POEM, and DLQI. RESULTS: 96 patients were enrolled and randomized, of which 83 patients completed the study. EASI and SCORAD scores were lower in all groups at 2nd consultation (p < 0.05); however, these were highly significant for group 3 (p < 0.05); however, these were highly significant for group 3 (p < 0.05); however, these were highly significant for group 3 (p < 0.05); however, these were highly significant for group 3 (. CONCLUSION: A reduction in severity following objective assessments of the AD was observed for all groups and was highly significant for patients offered a memory button and the corresponding app. Furthermore, patients reported a significant subjective beneficial effect if they used the memory button and app. This indicates that digital solutions may have a benefit in clinical practice and may reduce nonadherence and increase the wellbeing of the patients.

The Feasibility of Implementing Deep Inspiration Breath-Hold for Pediatric Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: Radiation therapy delivery during deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) reduces the irradiation of the heart and lungs and is therefore recommended for adults with mediastinal lymphoma. However, no studies have addressed the use of DIBH in children. This pilot study investigates the feasibility of and compliance with DIBH in children. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Children from the age of 5 years were recruited to a training session to assess their ability to perform DIBH. No children received radiation therapy. The children were placed in a potential radiation therapy position. The DIBH was voluntary and monitored using an optical surface system providing visual feedback. Children who performed 3 stable DIBHs of 20 seconds each and remained motionless were deemed DIBH compliant. Compliance, equipment suitability, and coaching were further assessed in a semistructured interview. RESULTS: We included 33 children (18 healthy and 15 hospitalized children with cancer) with a mean age of 8.5 years (range, 5-15). A total of 28 (85%) children were DIBH compliant. Twenty children were deemed immediately DIBH compliant, and 8 were deemed conditionally DIBH compliant, as DIBH compliance was presumed with custom-made immobilization and/or additional DIBH training. Mean age of the DIBH-compliant and the non-DIBH-compliant children was 8.9 years (range, 5-15) and 6 years (range, 5-9), respectively. Only 1 of 15 hospitalized children was not DIBH compliant and only 1 of all 33 children was unable to grasp the DIBH concept. The available DIBH equipment was suitable for children, and 94% reported that they were happy with training and performing DIBH. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrated that children from the age of 5 years can potentially comply with the DIBH technique and perform stable and reproducible DIBHs suitable for radiation therapy. Custom-made immobilization and adequate training will potentially increase DIBH compliance. A prospective clinical trial (NCT03315546), investigating the dosimetric benefit of radiation therapy delivery in DIBH compared with free breathing with pediatric patients, has been initiated.

TEDDI: radiotherapy delivery in deep inspiration for pediatric patients - a NOPHO feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy (RT) delivered in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) is a simple technique, in which changes in patient anatomy can significantly reduce the irradiation of the organs at risk (OARs) surrounding the treatment target. DIBH is routinely used in the treatment of some adult patients to diminish the risk of late effects; however, no formalized studies have addressed the potential benefit of DIBH in children. METHODS/DESIGN: TEDDI is a multicenter, non-randomized, feasibility study. The study investigates the dosimetric benefit of RT delivered in DIBH compared to free breathing (FB) in pediatric patients. Also, the study aims to establish the compliance to DIBH and to determine the accuracy and reproducibility in a pediatric setting. Pediatric patients (aged 5-17 years) with a tumor in the mediastinum or upper abdomen with the possible need of RT will be included in the study. Written informed consent is obligatory. Prior to any treatment, patients will undergo a DIBH training session followed by a diagnostic PET/CT- or CT-staging scan in both DIBH and FB. If the patient proceeds to RT, a RT planning CT scan will be performed in both DIBH and FB and two separate treatment plans will be calculated. The superior treatment plan, i.e. equal target coverage and lowest overall dose to the OARs, will be chosen for treatment. Patient comfort will be assessed daily by questionnaires and by adherence to the respiratory management procedure. DISCUSSION: RT in DIBH is expected to diminish irradiation of the OARs surrounding the treatment target and thereby reduce the risk of late effects in childhood cancer survivors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Danish Ethical Committee (H-16035870, approved November 24th 2016, prospectively registered). The Danish Data Protection Agency (2012-58-0004, approved January 1st 2017, prospectively registered). Registered at clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT03315546 , October 20th  2017, retrospectively registered).